For the most part, the month of January is a cinematic graveyard.
Major studios dump their weakest, most derivative movies there so they can be
immediately forgotten. If a movie gets bumped from a prime fall release
date—like say in November or December—to January, it’s usually not a good sign.
Occasionally, however, a movie will come along with loftier aspirations. “Predestination,”—written
and directed by Peter and Michael Spierig—is one of those movies; in fact its
twisty time travel premise makes it one of the more ambitious January releases
in recent years. At the same time, that’s not saying very much. Ultimately
“Predestination” suffers from some glaring storytelling issues and a plot that gets
increasingly more silly and messy.
Ethan Hawke plays a Temporal Agent—aka a time traveling
special agent—who goes back in time to stop crime before it can happen. For his
last mission he must travel back to the 70’s and stop the Fizzle Bomber, the
one criminal who’s evaded him throughout time. While posing as a bartender he
runs into a young “woman” (Sarah Snook) who tells him her long, woeful life
story. Being abandoned by her parents as a baby and having to grow up in an
orphanage, not fitting in anywhere, as well as finding out that she’s a hermaphrodite.
Something that further alienates him/her from the rest of society.
Not surprisingly, “Predestination” gets more complicated and
messy as it goes on, eventually leading to a major twist-- involving the
identities of our two characters as well as the identity of the Fizzle
Bomber—that’s clever but also pretty ridiculous to say the least. The more you
think about it afterwards, the more you think about how the movie gets to that end
point, the more ridiculous it becomes. In fact it verges on comedic; a tone I’m
not sure the sibling directors intended. I wish I could say more but I would
spoil the entire ending.
With that said, the movie is competently made and acted.
Hawke and Snook are both solid, playing people that haven’t exactly lived
fulfilling lives. Hawke’s Temporal Agent is haunted by his inability to catch
the Fizzle Bomber after all these years, preventing him from retiring. Hawke
continues to show off his ability to play likable Average Joe’s and relative newcomer
Snook gives a quietly powerful performance as someone who hasn’t been able to
catch a break his/her entire life. “Predestination” may be one of the first sci-fi
movies to feature a hermaphroditic main character, whose “condition” fits
prominently into the rest of the story.
For being a high concept, time travel movie “Predestination”
feels surprisingly small scale. This is most likely the result of a low budget.
While it does create a level of intimacy, the narrative also feels constricted.
At times you get the impression that the movie wants to be as big as its
concepts. Outside of Hawke, Snook and Noah Taylor as the head of the Temporal
Agency, there aren’t any other noticeable characters. Overall I think the movie
could have benefitted from a few more set pieces and characters, to add scale
and nuance. Not only that, “Predestination” gets bogged down by some lazy
storytelling devices; namely the use of flashbacks when Snook’s character
recounts his/her life story to Hawke. In general flashbacks should be avoided,
or used very sparingly. In the case of “Predestination” a rather large chunk of
its running time is devoted to these flashbacks. Now yes, the flashbacks do contain
important information—some of which will come into play at the end—but to have
this person tell their life story in one sitting gets to be incredibly
exhausting for the audience members. And even worse, when the flashback portion
finally concludes the movie settles into its home stretch. Considering that the
movie is trying to be clever, you’d think the writer-director siblings could
find a better way to relay this information. It sort of puts a damper on the
movie’s gutsier and more unique attributes.
All in all, “Predestination” isn’t a great movie—if it was
it wouldn’t be released in January—but I commend the Spierig brothers for
trying to make a dense and ambitious picture. Sure, it’s kind of a mess and I
wish so much of it didn’t consist of one character telling another their life
story. But it’s an interesting movie nonetheless, which usually isn’t the case
with January releases.
C+
No comments:
Post a Comment