Denis Villeneuve’s “Sicario,” a film about the U.S./Mexican
border drug war, doesn’t shy away from showing us graphic unsettling violence. Characters
are shot, beaten and tortured. Mutilated bodies hang from an overpass in
Juarez. A seemingly normal Arizona suburban home houses corpses hidden in the
walls like a tomb. However, violence is probably the least surprising aspect of
Villeneuve’s picture. Things have gotten so bad that cartel violence has become
an everyday occurrence.
Yet the film isn’t focused on the violence but on how said violence is just the outer layer of a
complex, utterly messy situation rife with corruption and shady doings on both
sides of the border. In fact there is no finite “border,”—the characters in
“Sicario” create their own boundaries, their own set of rules. Futility flows
through “Sicario” like blood; it makes Steven Soderbergh’s “Traffic” look like
“Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” “Traffic” (which chronicled the conflict from
multiple perspectives: the cops, the criminals, the addicts, the politicians,
etc.) has its fair share of dourness and futility but it ends on a note of
optimism: this isn’t going to be an easy fight but we’re making progress. In
Villeneuve’s picture there isn’t a single ray of hope. Its message: Yeah…everything
is really complicated and screwed up and there isn’t a damn thing you can do
about it.
Not exactly uplifting and “Sicario” definitely won’t be for
everyone. Yet, for those who like gritty pessimistic crime cinema (like myself)
the movie is hugely entertaining and well made. Villeneuve and screenwriter
Taylor Sheridan don’t try and tell a sprawling epic about the drug war using
multiple perspectives like “Traffic.” Instead they fit all that chaos and
messiness into a tightknit, character driven neo noir. Fresh-faced F.B.I. agent
Kate Macer (Emily Blunt) is recruited by a task force made up various U.S. and
Mexican government operatives like Matt (Josh Brolin) and Alejandro (Benicio
Del Toro) to take down a major cartel boss. The thrill and intrigue of
“Sicario” comes from the moral complexity of the characters. The traditional
notions of good and evil, just and unjust, don’t apply anymore. Everyone has
their own agenda and self-manufactured definitions of right and wrong,
definitions they can bend and reshape as they please. This moral ambiguity
makes “Sicario” consistently exciting and unpredictable.
At first glance Kate doesn’t appear to serve that much of a
purpose. For most of the movie she’s off to the side reacting while Alejandro,
Matt and others do the major police work. She’s a smart and fully competent agent
but is often patronized and excluded. My initial reaction to her was puzzlement;
why insert this seemingly useless character? But I don’t think she’s useless.
Her role is that of the naïve, straight-laced outsider who’s forced to witness
the chaos and messiness of the drug war and is unable to do anything about it
(further adding to the movie’s sense of futility). The character isn’t great
and Villeneuve could have given Blunt more to do but Kate provides the film
with some stability and moral outrage to balance out the grittiness. She’s also
representative of the audience. We try to make sense of this violent,
complicated onscreen world and its violent, complicated inhabitants. We often
don’t approve of what we see or even fully understand but we’re unable to act. All
we can do is sit and let it happen.
The acting is solid across the board; Blunt is understated
and sincere, while Brolin is playful and scenery chewing. Amidst all the bleakness
“Sicario” has a dark sense of humor. And then there’s Del Toro-- quietly
menacing and dangerous while also managing to give off a calming
non-threatening presence. You’re skeptical of Alejandro but at the same time
he’s a valuable asset to have (he’s good with a gun, knowledgeable of the area
and the drug war). Alejandro slyly emerges as the most fascinating, morally
conflicted character in the movie.
And all of this guided by the graceful, nonmelodramatic
directorial hand of Villeneuve. He moves the picture along at a steady unhurried
pace, usually stretching sequences out to create maximum tension and paranoia.
In this corrupted, lawless environment danger is everywhere. You never know who
might be trying to kill you so it’s best to tread lightly. "Sicario"isn't groundbreaking in its style or structure, it's just a really well executed dark crime drama; handsomely shot by master cinematographer Roger Deakins, while Johan Johansson's subtle electronic score pulses in the background helping to amp up the tension.
A-
fandango - One long teenage whine, vaguely disguised as a thriller, and with a heroine so utterly useless, she could have come from a 50s rom-com. Never less than hyperbolic, the fact that the plot makes not the slightest sense is hidden by the way in the director throws in so many elements, the audience is bewildered into thinking something significant is taking place. In fact, it is more like a smoke-and- mirrors conjuring trick than anything resembling entertainment. I had thought self-important and dishonest film making had reached its nadir with Syriana, but I was wrong. Anyone who watched the cringeworthy 2016 Oscars would be aware that Hollywood is more a propaganda division of the party that gives then the huge tax breaks than an entertainment industry nowadays, the question is: Why do film critics so unfailingly give 'film of the year' status to such adolescent tripe?
ReplyDeleteamerican made 123movies
watch moana 123movies
12 strong full movie 123movies
watch into the badlands online free
watch harry potter and the chamber of secrets online free