Courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox
I never thought I would say this about “Abraham Lincoln:
Vampire Hunter” (an adaptation of a bestselling book by Seth Graham Smith) but
if it had been longer, I think it would have been better. Early on, it was
reported that the movie had a running time of about 2 hours and 45 minutes.
Now, I know what you’re going to say: What? That’s way too long a running time
for a movie called “Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter,” and before seeing it I
would have said the same thing. But if the movie had been 2 hours and 45
minutes the story would be more complete, the characters more established.
Making for at least a decent semi-revisionist history film.
However, the way it is now, at a running time of 105 minutes
the picture is a muddled and chaotic mess. It’s also a visual eye sore, the use
of CGI is hideous. In the opening scene we get an overhead shot of a computer
generated Washington D.C that looks like a cheap graphic used in a History
Channel doc.
The movie begins when Lincoln is just a boy, and a vampire
kills his mother because his father couldn’t pay off a debt to his ex-employer
(who is also a vampire). Fast-forward several years, Lincoln is now in his
young adulthood and is played by Benjamin Walker (who’s only had minor roles up
to this point). Lincoln is ready for some vengeance but he doesn’t know that
he’s after vampires.
That’s where Henry Sturgess (Dominic Cooper) comes in, a
vampire who is mad at his fellow vampires for killing his wife. So he takes Abe
under his wing and teaches him how to kill using an ax. Apparently old Abe is a
natural at killing vampires. All he requires is one day of training and all he
does in that day is learn how to twirl his ax (because you know, that’s an
important skill in killing vampires) and chop down one tree using his built up
anger.
So next thing we know he’s getting kill assignments from
Henry. (On a side note: Why is it that in vampire movies other than “Twilight”
the vampires, when they feed, make their faces big and decrepit looking even
though they look normal to begin with? It never seems to help them.) Along the
way he meets his future wife, Mary (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), his old black
childhood friend Will (Anthony Mackie) and others. One of the main issues with
this picture is that director Timur Beckmambetov (“Wanted”) and screenwriter
Graham-Smith stuff too much into one movie. They want to show us Lincoln’s
origins, how he got to be a hunter but then they also want to flash forward to
when he’s in office so, they can use the civil war as an excuse for the
vampires to try and take over the world. They cram two massive storylines into
one film.
The truth is, that this project was always going to have to
fight an uphill battle. As good as the fans of Graham-Smith’s novel may think
that book is, I don’t think mass audiences are going to want to see something
like this. Like “John Carter” it’s not a well known subject or franchise. In
that regard, I give Beckmambetov some credit for taking a chance. What he could
have done with this material is make it more tongue in cheek and ham up the
violence, so at the very least it could be a gory, entertaining guilty
pleasure, much in the way Robert Rodriguez’s “Machete” was in 2010.
But “Abe Lincoln” wants to be taken seriously, for the most
part. It wants us to believe that Lincoln was a vampire hunter and that he lost
his mother and then young son. And that’s where the major problem lies. I don’t
care if this is a made up story, the thought of Honest Abe taking an ax to a vampire’s
head is something that’s extremely difficult to take seriously. Now, if the
movie had been 2 hours and 45 minutes then Lincoln’s character would be more
established. His struggle would be better defined. Therefore—within these
boundaries—his motives for killing would be more believable. Beckmambetov could
show more of Lincoln’s training, show more of Henry helping Lincoln use his
built up anger to his advantage. Unfortunately, the way it is now, the story is
too rushed and the characters are too thin to be taken for anything except
parody or very light drama.
On top of that the movie isn’t one bit creative or exciting
in its action. In “Machete,” Machete grabbed a man’s intestine out of his
stomach and used it as a rope. In “Abe Lincoln” there’s no such creativity with
any of the vampire killings. They’re stuck in the “Sherlock Holmes” (the Guy
Richie remakes) school of slow motion fight scenes, which is cool the first
time it’s used but Beckmambetov uses it every time to the point where it
becomes repetitive real fast.
Walker, Cooper and the other actors do the best with what
they have but it’s clear that this movie doesn’t really depend on actors…or
well rounded characters for that matter. Beckmambetov and crew only seem to
care about the action and moving the story along. I guess they thought Abe
Lincoln would speak for himself. But with a story as ridiculous as this, having
a guy strap on a beard and top hat and doing some cliché Lincoln stuff isn’t
enough character development.
1/4
No comments:
Post a Comment